The first is a simple malware protection test, evaluating how the antivirus handles a collection of malware samples that I collected and analyzed myself. When there are no lab results, these tests are all I’ve got to go on. I run a series of hands-on tests for all antivirus products, even those that get gold stars from the labs. With 10 of 10 possible points, AVG has the current best lab test score. Norton and Avast One Essential are very close, with 9.7 points each.ĪVG only appears in the latest reports from three of the four labs, but its scores are uniformly perfect. Considering just products tested by all four labs, Kaspersky holds the top score, a near-perfect 9.9 points. Over the years, I've developed an algorithm to map all the results onto a 10-point scale and derive an aggregate score. AV-Test offers numeric ratings in three categories, AV-Comparatives and SE Labs report certification levels, and MRG-Effitas is close to a pass/fail system. In any case, the labs state clearly that their tests apply only to the tested product, not to related products.Įach lab uses its own style for reporting. But, due to a drag on system resources, it only scored four points for Performance, for a total of 16. It likewise aced the Usability category, meaning it exhibited few or no false-positive results. Check Point scored six of six possible points in the all-important Protection category. AV-Comparatives, AV-Test, SE Labs, and MRG-Effitas all skip ZoneAlarm in their tests of consumer-side security products-I get no help from them.ĪV-Test Institute does include Check Point Endpoint Security in its latest report on business products. I supplement my hands-on testing with reports from four independent antivirus labs when such data is available. Perhaps it’s not surprising that ZoneAlarm now relies on Check Point’s own Harmony Endpoint protection engine, the technology that powers the company’s enterprise-grade security products. While Kaspersky’s products continue to perform admirably, the company’s reputation is shaky these days. Previous versions of ZoneAlarm’s consumer products relied on an antivirus engine licensed from Kaspersky. ZoneAlarm lets you schedule a quick or full scan to run daily, weekly, or monthly. Even so, many users like to schedule a regular scan, for maximum protection. Once you’ve performed that first full scan the real-time protection system should theoretically handle any new incursions from the malware realm. Apparently, ZoneAlarm isn’t among this group. Many antivirus products use the first full scan to optimize for subsequent scans. On a malware-free test system, a full scan with ZoneAlarm took two hours and 25 minutes, more than twice the current average. If you want to use it in a business setting, or if you want tech support, you'll have to purchase the PRO edition.Īny time you install a new antivirus product, you should always run a full scan as soon as is convenient. The latter two have a Buy Now overlay, indicating you don’t get them for free.Īs with many free products, this one is only free for personal use. Four icons across the bottom offer access to Antivirus, Firewall, Web Secure, and Anti-Ransomware. Concentric circles in red or green emphasize the status indicator. A security status indicator displays a green checkmark if all is well or a red X if there’s a problem. Prior to the current NextGen release, ZoneAlarm’s appearance hadn’t changed significantly in more than 10 years and it was looking dated. Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security Software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |